表1:Sisoft Sandra科学计算性能 | |||
测试项目 |
Core i5 750 |
Core i7 870 |
Core i7 920 |
Aggregate Arithmetic Performance |
46.4GOPS |
69.6GOPS |
67.5GPPS |
Dhrystone iSEE4.2 |
57GIPS |
74.5GIPS |
71.83GIPS |
Whetstone iSEE3 |
35.87GFLOPS |
67.7GFLOPS |
63.19GFLOPS |
Aggregate Multi-Media Performance |
81.49MPixel/s |
119Mpixel/s |
113.45Mpixel/s |
Multi-Media Int x8 iSEE4.1 |
100.46MPixel/s |
132.82MPixel/s |
125.45MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Float x4 iSEE2 |
62.52Mpixel/s |
105.38MPixel/s |
101.44MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2 |
31.88Mpixel/s |
56MPixel/s |
52.13MPixel/s |
Inter-Core Bandwidth |
13.22GB/s |
37.75GB/s |
33GB/s |
Inter-Core Latency |
56ns |
13ns |
17ns |
Cryptographic Bandwidth |
414MB/s |
426MB/s |
408MB/s |
AES256 CPU Cryptographic Bandwidth |
338MB/s |
370MB/s |
354MB/s |
SHA256 CPU Hashing Bandwidth |
490MB/s |
483MB/s |
463MB/s |
表2:3DMark Vantage成绩对比 | |||
测试项目 |
Core i5 750 |
Core i7 870 |
Core i7 920 |
总分 |
H8747 |
H8999 |
H9019 |
GPU得分 |
8279 |
8259 |
8314 |
CPU得分(关闭PPU) |
12869 |
18425 |
17373 |
表3:基准性能测试 | |||
测试项目 |
Core i5 750 |
Core i7 870 |
Core i7 920 |
Super PI 1M |
13.448s |
11.825s |
14.617s |
Wprime 32M |
10.845s |
8.238s |
8.72s |
WinRAR压缩能力 |
2350MB/s |
3305MB/s |
3055MB/s |
Cinebench R10 单核 |
3507 |
3807 |
3217 |
CineBench R10 多核 |
11286 |
13727 |
12994 |
表4:PCMark Vantage 成绩对比 | |||
测试项目 |
Core i5 750 |
Core i7 870 |
Core i7 920 |
PCMark总分 |
6439 |
6957 |
6507 |
Memories Score |
6189 |
6326 |
7987 |
TV and Movies Score |
4939 |
4975 |
4963 |
Gaming Score |
7494 |
8325 |
7763 |
Music Score |
5663 |
5992 |
5558 |
Communications Score |
5708 |
6175 |
5679 |
Productivity Score |
5494 |
5818 |
5417 |
HDD Score |
4884 |
4900 |
5163 |
从测试成绩来分析,虽然Core i7 920拥有三通道内存的优势,但是在很多项目上已经落后于
Core i7 870,仅比Core i5 750稍好。究其原因一是默认频率较低,只有2.66GHz,而新的处理器均支持睿频技术,可以在测试中拔高频率以提高成绩;二是新处理器内置PCI-E控制器之后,延迟大大降低,在图形性能上更具优势。